Which statement about antiseptic handrub is NOT correct?

The statement that ethanol (60 to 95%) is classified by the FDA as a Category II antiseptic agent is not correct. The FDA classifies antiseptics in two categories: Category I, which are considered effective and safe, and Category II, which are considered not safe or effective. Ethanol at the specified concentrations is recognized for its effectiveness in killing a wide range of pathogens, which has led to its classification under Category I, not Category II.

In contrast, the other statements accurately reflect the principles and guidelines associated with antiseptic handrubs. For example, the definition of antiseptic handrub as applying a waterless antiseptic agent is precise, as these products are intended for use without the need for water, promoting ease of use in various settings. Furthermore, antiseptic handrubs are scientifically backed for effectively removing or killing transient microorganisms while reducing the resident flora, contributing to overall hand hygiene practices. Additionally, health organizations like the CDC and WHO have endorsed antiseptic handrubs as superior to traditional handwashing in many situations, particularly when soap and water are not readily available.